<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Long for a Good Publicity Stunt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2006/10/26/i-long-for-a-good-publicity-stunt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2006/10/26/i-long-for-a-good-publicity-stunt/</link>
	<description>Small business marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:39:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: mlgreen8753</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2006/10/26/i-long-for-a-good-publicity-stunt/#comment-411065</link>
		<dc:creator>mlgreen8753</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-411065</guid>
		<description>These days you really don&#039;t need publicity stunts as long as you have a good  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adwido.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;online advertising&lt;/a&gt; strategy that involves good content which tends to go viral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days you really don&#39;t need publicity stunts as long as you have a good  <a href="http://www.adwido.com" rel="nofollow">online advertising</a> strategy that involves good content which tends to go viral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlgreen8753</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2006/10/26/i-long-for-a-good-publicity-stunt/#comment-408948</link>
		<dc:creator>mlgreen8753</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408948</guid>
		<description>These days you really don&#039;t need publicity stunts as long as you have a good  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adwido.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;online advertising&lt;/a&gt; strategy that involves good content which tends to go viral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days you really don&#39;t need publicity stunts as long as you have a good  <a href="http://www.adwido.com" rel="nofollow">online advertising</a> strategy that involves good content which tends to go viral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Wilson Reynolds &#187; Blog Archive
 &#187; Are Publicity Stunts Ethical?</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2006/10/26/i-long-for-a-good-publicity-stunt/#comment-13163</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Wilson Reynolds &#187; Blog Archive
 &#187; Are Publicity Stunts Ethical?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13163</guid>
		<description>&lt;pingback /&gt;...Java &amp; Business Blogging 101                                         ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<pingback />&#8230;Java &#038; Business Blogging 101    </p>
<p>   &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Gilliatt</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2006/10/26/i-long-for-a-good-publicity-stunt/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Gilliatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-947</guid>
		<description>Steve, great example, and I like the phrase &quot;authentic publicity stunt.&quot; When Branson does something outrageous to attract attention, he&#039;s completely in the open about (a) who&#039;s doing it (he is!) and (b) why. There&#039;s no hidden agenda, just a master publicity hound at work.

I saw a presentation on Audi&#039;s &quot;Art of the Heist&quot; promotion a few months ago. Their ad agency folks ( http://www.mckinney-silver.com/ ) talked about how they built this complex, multimedia game around a fictional car theft. They used web sites, blogs and more to follow the story line of what was actually a contest to find the &quot;stolen&quot; car. If you just glanced at it, you might think they were flogging, but if you looked closely, *every* web site and blog clearly identified the promotion and sponsor at the bottom of the page. The audience could see that it was a game, paid for by Audi.

That&#039;s the difference. Color outside the lines, be edgy, do whatever you want. Just be transparent (there&#039;s that word again) about who&#039;s paying for it and whether the participants are people or characters. When agency employees write and a company pays for a blog that doesn&#039;t disclose its relationship with the sponsor, that&#039;s when people get exercised about ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, great example, and I like the phrase &#8220;authentic publicity stunt.&#8221; When Branson does something outrageous to attract attention, he&#8217;s completely in the open about (a) who&#8217;s doing it (he is!) and (b) why. There&#8217;s no hidden agenda, just a master publicity hound at work.</p>
<p>I saw a presentation on Audi&#8217;s &#8220;Art of the Heist&#8221; promotion a few months ago. Their ad agency folks ( <a href="http://www.mckinney-silver.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mckinney-silver.com/</a> ) talked about how they built this complex, multimedia game around a fictional car theft. They used web sites, blogs and more to follow the story line of what was actually a contest to find the &#8220;stolen&#8221; car. If you just glanced at it, you might think they were flogging, but if you looked closely, *every* web site and blog clearly identified the promotion and sponsor at the bottom of the page. The audience could see that it was a game, paid for by Audi.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the difference. Color outside the lines, be edgy, do whatever you want. Just be transparent (there&#8217;s that word again) about who&#8217;s paying for it and whether the participants are people or characters. When agency employees write and a company pays for a blog that doesn&#8217;t disclose its relationship with the sponsor, that&#8217;s when people get exercised about ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2006/10/26/i-long-for-a-good-publicity-stunt/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-955</guid>
		<description>Very few can do an authentic publicity stunt like Richard Branson. Who else would launch their mobile services, by going into a competitors branch and super soak the staff?

He is the king of authentic publicity stunts!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very few can do an authentic publicity stunt like Richard Branson. Who else would launch their mobile services, by going into a competitors branch and super soak the staff?</p>
<p>He is the king of authentic publicity stunts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Engler</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2006/10/26/i-long-for-a-good-publicity-stunt/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>John Engler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-957</guid>
		<description>John,

I think the idea with the &quot;tool&quot; is to help those people that work at PR agencies and who have absolutely no morals figure out what&#039;s a bad idea before they launch it into the public, forever damaging themselves, the brands they represent, and further confusing the rest of the world about what&#039;s ethical and what&#039;s not.

Actually, I agree with you too, but can definitely see a change in the youngsters coming up in the ranks, in that more and more of them have absoltely no idea when something goes too far... I blame that more on our society&#039;s loosening of ethcis and morals than on anything else.  

If there&#039;s a tool that&#039;ll help us follow the guidelines that WOMMA has established, and we need that help, I&#039;m glad it&#039;s there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>I think the idea with the &#8220;tool&#8221; is to help those people that work at PR agencies and who have absolutely no morals figure out what&#8217;s a bad idea before they launch it into the public, forever damaging themselves, the brands they represent, and further confusing the rest of the world about what&#8217;s ethical and what&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>Actually, I agree with you too, but can definitely see a change in the youngsters coming up in the ranks, in that more and more of them have absoltely no idea when something goes too far&#8230; I blame that more on our society&#8217;s loosening of ethcis and morals than on anything else.  </p>
<p>If there&#8217;s a tool that&#8217;ll help us follow the guidelines that WOMMA has established, and we need that help, I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jantsch</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2006/10/26/i-long-for-a-good-publicity-stunt/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jantsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-958</guid>
		<description>I guess I didn&#039;t mean to pick on WOMMA, I think they are, as John points out, filling a void that obviously needs some filling.

My point was more of a reaction to the &quot;outrage&quot; from folks. 

Nathan, great clarification, thanks for the thoughtful comment. I was not defending either by the way - my point was more about encouraging people to at least consider doing some edgy creative things without constantly looking over your shoulder for the rath of the blog posse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I didn&#8217;t mean to pick on WOMMA, I think they are, as John points out, filling a void that obviously needs some filling.</p>
<p>My point was more of a reaction to the &#8220;outrage&#8221; from folks. </p>
<p>Nathan, great clarification, thanks for the thoughtful comment. I was not defending either by the way &#8211; my point was more about encouraging people to at least consider doing some edgy creative things without constantly looking over your shoulder for the rath of the blog posse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Gilliatt</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2006/10/26/i-long-for-a-good-publicity-stunt/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Gilliatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-959</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused. Are you defending the flog(s) or the front group? &quot;Astroturf&quot; significantly predates web 2.0. It&#039;s a term for fake grass-roots efforts (such as creating a front group that hides its affiliation with the supported cause/party/company). Creating front groups is listed as an example of an ethics violation by the PRSA. It&#039;s not just a WOMMA thing.

     http://prsa.org/_About/ethics/disclosure.asp?ident=eth5

The WM across America flog wasn&#039;t the company&#039;s first attempt; they&#039;ve done this before. And WFWM isn&#039;t a publicity stunt, it&#039;s an advocacy group, apparently funded by Wal-Mart and organized by Edelman. This is politics, and it&#039;s important to know who&#039;s talking when they make statements in support of the company.

Besides, most of the heat has bypassed Wal-Mart and gone straight to Edelman, where they *wrote* the WOMMA ethics code (ok, they helped). Set yourself up as a leader, and people will have high expectations of your behavior.

Most companies don&#039;t have the same exposure as the world&#039;s largest retailer or a leading voice in social media and PR. If you still want to get attention with a stunt, knock yourself out. Just try not to offend the blogging natives too much, and don&#039;t drop turkeys from a helicopter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. Are you defending the flog(s) or the front group? &#8220;Astroturf&#8221; significantly predates web 2.0. It&#8217;s a term for fake grass-roots efforts (such as creating a front group that hides its affiliation with the supported cause/party/company). Creating front groups is listed as an example of an ethics violation by the PRSA. It&#8217;s not just a WOMMA thing.</p>
<p>     <a href="http://prsa.org/_About/ethics/disclosure.asp?ident=eth5" rel="nofollow">http://prsa.org/_About/ethics/disclosure.asp?ident=eth5</a></p>
<p>The WM across America flog wasn&#8217;t the company&#8217;s first attempt; they&#8217;ve done this before. And WFWM isn&#8217;t a publicity stunt, it&#8217;s an advocacy group, apparently funded by Wal-Mart and organized by Edelman. This is politics, and it&#8217;s important to know who&#8217;s talking when they make statements in support of the company.</p>
<p>Besides, most of the heat has bypassed Wal-Mart and gone straight to Edelman, where they *wrote* the WOMMA ethics code (ok, they helped). Set yourself up as a leader, and people will have high expectations of your behavior.</p>
<p>Most companies don&#8217;t have the same exposure as the world&#8217;s largest retailer or a leading voice in social media and PR. If you still want to get attention with a stunt, knock yourself out. Just try not to offend the blogging natives too much, and don&#8217;t drop turkeys from a helicopter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 404/411 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.ducttapemarketing.com @ 2012-02-10 03:00:54 -->
