<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Think The New York Times Gets It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2007/06/17/i-think-the-new-york-times-gets-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2007/06/17/i-think-the-new-york-times-gets-it/</link>
	<description>Small business marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:03:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: billy</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2007/06/17/i-think-the-new-york-times-gets-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1808</link>
		<dc:creator>billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1808</guid>
		<description>this windows framework is taking forever to download and install. let&#039;s hope this nyt reader thing is worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this windows framework is taking forever to download and install. let&#8217;s hope this nyt reader thing is worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2007/06/17/i-think-the-new-york-times-gets-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1809</guid>
		<description>Certainly it adds great value to online reading, with nice and clear look with more white and bit green. Even the fonts are bit bigger than the average and will improve readability. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly it adds great value to online reading, with nice and clear look with more white and bit green. Even the fonts are bit bigger than the average and will improve readability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KCLau</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2007/06/17/i-think-the-new-york-times-gets-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1810</link>
		<dc:creator>KCLau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1810</guid>
		<description>In Malaysia, The Star newspaper had launched such service long ago. They provide the online newspaper version with lower subscription compared to the actual paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Malaysia, The Star newspaper had launched such service long ago. They provide the online newspaper version with lower subscription compared to the actual paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nat_nudge</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2007/06/17/i-think-the-new-york-times-gets-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1813</link>
		<dc:creator>nat_nudge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1813</guid>
		<description>Iagree that it is a move in the right direction for the NYT&#039;s.
I am not sure about the revenue model though.  They way people gather there news now, do they want to pay for the privilege of the Reader?  You have a generation of people now who have become accustomed to never having to pay for content (or have never experienced it).
Though the possibilities in this area a significant.  News aggregation services etc (like blog/news readers) are definitely where things seem to be heading.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iagree that it is a move in the right direction for the NYT&#8217;s.<br />
I am not sure about the revenue model though.  They way people gather there news now, do they want to pay for the privilege of the Reader?  You have a generation of people now who have become accustomed to never having to pay for content (or have never experienced it).<br />
Though the possibilities in this area a significant.  News aggregation services etc (like blog/news readers) are definitely where things seem to be heading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terra Andersen</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2007/06/17/i-think-the-new-york-times-gets-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1815</link>
		<dc:creator>Terra Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1815</guid>
		<description>Hopefully other biggies will follow in NYT&#039;s direction! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully other biggies will follow in NYT&#8217;s direction!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2007/06/17/i-think-the-new-york-times-gets-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>This is a feature that the Investors Business Daily has had for years.

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a feature that the Investors Business Daily has had for years.</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
