<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google wins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/</link>
	<description>Small business marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:06:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ð—Ð½Ð°Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐºÐ°</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-314814</link>
		<dc:creator>Ð—Ð½Ð°Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐºÐ°</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/#comment-314814</guid>
		<description>I donâ€™t know if a stronger Google is really a good thing but I want to create my own SE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I donâ€™t know if a stronger Google is really a good thing but I want to create my own SE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluebeetle(one)</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-291006</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluebeetle(one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/#comment-291006</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right indeed only Google is reinforced in this attempt to acquire Yahoo!

Indeed only shareholders have something to win from Micro$oft-Yahoo! merge.

If M$ is victorious, it will be a bad news for the web &amp; for Yahoo! employees (many of them will be â€œsacrifiedâ€ in the name of â€œeliminating redundant infrastructure and duplicative operating costsâ€)
;o(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right indeed only Google is reinforced in this attempt to acquire Yahoo!</p>
<p>Indeed only shareholders have something to win from Micro$oft-Yahoo! merge.</p>
<p>If M$ is victorious, it will be a bad news for the web &amp; for Yahoo! employees (many of them will be â€œsacrifiedâ€ in the name of â€œeliminating redundant infrastructure and duplicative operating costsâ€)<br />
;o(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD Savelli</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-287488</link>
		<dc:creator>JD Savelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/#comment-287488</guid>
		<description>John,

I agree with you. There is not such a thing as a strategic merger. 

More often than not they result in mayhem, or arm-length management, and do not deliver the financials, the positioning, and the market share...(eBay/Skype, AOL/TW, etc.)

Now, although it probably does not apply here, most CEOs have their compensation plans strongly biased towards favorably benefiting from such increase in revenue base... This explains that.

I guess Google can celebrate, as lots of people are going to be losing focus on the business in the short to medium term!

jd
www.jdsavelli.com/blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>I agree with you. There is not such a thing as a strategic merger. </p>
<p>More often than not they result in mayhem, or arm-length management, and do not deliver the financials, the positioning, and the market share&#8230;(eBay/Skype, AOL/TW, etc.)</p>
<p>Now, although it probably does not apply here, most CEOs have their compensation plans strongly biased towards favorably benefiting from such increase in revenue base&#8230; This explains that.</p>
<p>I guess Google can celebrate, as lots of people are going to be losing focus on the business in the short to medium term!</p>
<p>jd<br />
<a href="http://www.jdsavelli.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.jdsavelli.com/blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Warfield</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-285137</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Warfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/#comment-285137</guid>
		<description>Microsoft missed a far superior acquisition target: Amazon.  Yahoo is just traffic, Amazon is strategic.  Moreover, if the transaction triggers further consolidation, and Google buys Amazon, that spells really bad news for Microsoft.

More on my blog:

http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/microsoft-yahoo-the-only-counter-google-combination-that-makes-sense-the-force-is-strong-in-another-one/

Best,

BW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft missed a far superior acquisition target: Amazon.  Yahoo is just traffic, Amazon is strategic.  Moreover, if the transaction triggers further consolidation, and Google buys Amazon, that spells really bad news for Microsoft.</p>
<p>More on my blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/microsoft-yahoo-the-only-counter-google-combination-that-makes-sense-the-force-is-strong-in-another-one/" rel="nofollow">http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/microsoft-yahoo-the-only-counter-google-combination-that-makes-sense-the-force-is-strong-in-another-one/</a></p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>BW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google FTW? : Man Bytes Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-284201</link>
		<dc:creator>Google FTW? : Man Bytes Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/#comment-284201</guid>
		<description>[...] Duct Tape Marketing has a post about the proposed Microsoft buyout of Yahoo and how much of a threat that would really be to Google. Even if you don&#8217;t go read it, the post title is telling&#8211;Google Wins. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Duct Tape Marketing has a post about the proposed Microsoft buyout of Yahoo and how much of a threat that would really be to Google. Even if you don&#8217;t go read it, the post title is telling&#8211;Google Wins. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-282979</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/#comment-282979</guid>
		<description>&quot;..and couldn&#039;t not have achieved by conventional methods&quot;

That sounds like admitting defeat to me!  I guess it depends on what you think of as the contest.

I think the contest is to be the dominant, most useful platform.  Google is taking Desktop Applications, including MS Office functions, and bringing them to the web.

Microsoft is following them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;..and couldn&#8217;t not have achieved by conventional methods&#8221;</p>
<p>That sounds like admitting defeat to me!  I guess it depends on what you think of as the contest.</p>
<p>I think the contest is to be the dominant, most useful platform.  Google is taking Desktop Applications, including MS Office functions, and bringing them to the web.</p>
<p>Microsoft is following them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agentgenius.com- national real estate opinion column &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft&#8217;s Bid For Yahoo [Counterpoint]</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-282162</link>
		<dc:creator>agentgenius.com- national real estate opinion column &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft&#8217;s Bid For Yahoo [Counterpoint]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/#comment-282162</guid>
		<description>[...] read a position today that made me think the merger might not actually be a great idea. John Jantsch of Duct Tape Marketing noted: My take is that Microsoft is admitting defeat by trying to buy their way out of it. Yahoo! has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read a position today that made me think the merger might not actually be a great idea. John Jantsch of Duct Tape Marketing noted: My take is that Microsoft is admitting defeat by trying to buy their way out of it. Yahoo! has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike ashworth</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-281618</link>
		<dc:creator>mike ashworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/02/02/google-wins/#comment-281618</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not certain I agree with your view that Microsoft has admitted defeat by this proposal.  Often a Company, even a large one such as Microsoft, will consider a strategic purchase, which will give it a position they did not have before, and couldn&#039;t not have achieved by conventional methods.

The good thing about this is that people are aware of Google&#039;s dominance and that a new Microsoft (as people are sometimes calling Google) needs to be competed against. 

I feel that the Companies wont drift, as they have experienced Management Teams who would not dare risk the shareholder value on something reckless.

What I like most about this announcement is that it&#039;s got people talking about all three companies, their market positions, their place now, their place in the future. Change is constant so I&#039;m looking forward to seeing how this will pan out

Mike Ashworth
Business Coach
Brighton and Hove, UK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not certain I agree with your view that Microsoft has admitted defeat by this proposal.  Often a Company, even a large one such as Microsoft, will consider a strategic purchase, which will give it a position they did not have before, and couldn&#8217;t not have achieved by conventional methods.</p>
<p>The good thing about this is that people are aware of Google&#8217;s dominance and that a new Microsoft (as people are sometimes calling Google) needs to be competed against. </p>
<p>I feel that the Companies wont drift, as they have experienced Management Teams who would not dare risk the shareholder value on something reckless.</p>
<p>What I like most about this announcement is that it&#8217;s got people talking about all three companies, their market positions, their place now, their place in the future. Change is constant so I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing how this will pan out</p>
<p>Mike Ashworth<br />
Business Coach<br />
Brighton and Hove, UK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
