<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Give Zoho Credit for Being Aggressive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/</link>
	<description>Small business marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:06:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deepa Govind</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/comment-page-1/#comment-401566</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepa Govind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/#comment-401566</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I have been using zoho for my freelancing business..
and this surely helps me keep track of docs (all kinds), without having to worry about version1 , 1.1, 1.1.2 etcetc. 
For the past 6 months, i have been managing my clients reports, &amp; documentations in zoho as well. Zoho only gets better by the day.

btw - any idea if zoho has some referral programm ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I have been using zoho for my freelancing business..<br />
and this surely helps me keep track of docs (all kinds), without having to worry about version1 , 1.1, 1.1.2 etcetc.<br />
For the past 6 months, i have been managing my clients reports, &amp; documentations in zoho as well. Zoho only gets better by the day.</p>
<p>btw &#8211; any idea if zoho has some referral programm ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Stannard</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/comment-page-1/#comment-400010</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Stannard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/#comment-400010</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how I feel about a company that rolls out product after product. Sure, they may have a large suite of tools but are any of them any good? I played around with the spreadsheet and the presentation engines and decided to stick to Office 2007 within a few minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how I feel about a company that rolls out product after product. Sure, they may have a large suite of tools but are any of them any good? I played around with the spreadsheet and the presentation engines and decided to stick to Office 2007 within a few minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/comment-page-1/#comment-399997</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/#comment-399997</guid>
		<description>John,

We&#039;re not 100% online yet, but I hope to get there. I chose Zoho Projects over Google Apps because I loved the ability to easily track hours by client and project. Zoho isn&#039;t super smooth design wise, but it&#039;s very handy. And it&#039;s extremely affordable for a small business like mine.

I&#039;m a fan! And I&#039;m a fan of your blog, too. Thanks for the good tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not 100% online yet, but I hope to get there. I chose Zoho Projects over Google Apps because I loved the ability to easily track hours by client and project. Zoho isn&#8217;t super smooth design wise, but it&#8217;s very handy. And it&#8217;s extremely affordable for a small business like mine.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan! And I&#8217;m a fan of your blog, too. Thanks for the good tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPC</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/comment-page-1/#comment-399993</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/#comment-399993</guid>
		<description>ZOHO is definitely batting on a good wicket here. It is still early days, and I prefer other people taking the risks and proving the efficacy of online apps like this, but it is definitely where the online world is heading. Makes the most sense to do things this way. Thanks for the heads-up, will be exploring and punting this service to my colleagues. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZOHO is definitely batting on a good wicket here. It is still early days, and I prefer other people taking the risks and proving the efficacy of online apps like this, but it is definitely where the online world is heading. Makes the most sense to do things this way. Thanks for the heads-up, will be exploring and punting this service to my colleagues. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/comment-page-1/#comment-399984</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/#comment-399984</guid>
		<description>Dear John,

I am Charles from Zoho Creator. Thanks for mentioning about Zoho. Thanks for the appreciation. We do have several businesses running on Zoho. We also constantly keep updating the services with new features and bug fixes. 

Dear Robert,

I am sorry that you had to face issues in the form with Captcha. Can you please let me know if you are saying that the entries are being submitted even if you don&#039;t give the correct word as in the image. Or is it that the image itself is not showing up? We are also coming up with Zoho Creator 3.0 in which you can expect a better confirmation system on form submit. We have also replaced the current captcha system with a more sophisticated one.

Regards,
Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John,</p>
<p>I am Charles from Zoho Creator. Thanks for mentioning about Zoho. Thanks for the appreciation. We do have several businesses running on Zoho. We also constantly keep updating the services with new features and bug fixes. </p>
<p>Dear Robert,</p>
<p>I am sorry that you had to face issues in the form with Captcha. Can you please let me know if you are saying that the entries are being submitted even if you don&#8217;t give the correct word as in the image. Or is it that the image itself is not showing up? We are also coming up with Zoho Creator 3.0 in which you can expect a better confirmation system on form submit. We have also replaced the current captcha system with a more sophisticated one.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarketingTwins-Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/comment-page-1/#comment-399978</link>
		<dc:creator>MarketingTwins-Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/#comment-399978</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a MAC guy and haven&#039;t plunked down the money for Office for Mac, so ZOHO actually is used in our business for me to communicate with my PC partner.  He does Excel, Word, etc, and I can&#039;t pull those in . . . except with ZOHO they offer a variety of tools that I can use.  He just posts his Office doc on to our ZOHO account and then I read it in ZOHO.  Works great and is saving me money.  I don&#039;t need Office for the Mac to do any work - just to read his.  We have also used the Planner function before to make a priority list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a MAC guy and haven&#8217;t plunked down the money for Office for Mac, so ZOHO actually is used in our business for me to communicate with my PC partner.  He does Excel, Word, etc, and I can&#8217;t pull those in . . . except with ZOHO they offer a variety of tools that I can use.  He just posts his Office doc on to our ZOHO account and then I read it in ZOHO.  Works great and is saving me money.  I don&#8217;t need Office for the Mac to do any work &#8211; just to read his.  We have also used the Planner function before to make a priority list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godzhesas</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/comment-page-1/#comment-399977</link>
		<dc:creator>Godzhesas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 07:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/#comment-399977</guid>
		<description>When speaking about productivity and project management online, recently after a thourough reasearch our company is now testing the paid versions of http://www.zoho.com/projects and http://www.comindwork.com. Speaking about online project management it would like Comindwork would be the best bang for the money, but other Zoho services are very tempting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When speaking about productivity and project management online, recently after a thourough reasearch our company is now testing the paid versions of <a href="http://www.zoho.com/projects" rel="nofollow">http://www.zoho.com/projects</a> and <a href="http://www.comindwork.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.comindwork.com</a>. Speaking about online project management it would like Comindwork would be the best bang for the money, but other Zoho services are very tempting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/comment-page-1/#comment-399975</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/07/06/give-zoho-credit-for-being-agressive/#comment-399975</guid>
		<description>@Dan -

I&#039;m sorry, Dan, I don&#039;t want to respond to this (because this is certainly not the topic that John is trying to cover), but statements like yours I&#039;ve seen all over the web and they give a really false impression for people (and reporters who spread them). (which is I&#039;m sure how you got this impression)

1) Comparing a productivity web application to Twitter (in terms of uptime) isn&#039;t fair to either of them.  Here&#039;s why:

In basic database design, at some point when you get a really big table (which happens when you have a lot of data) your going to want to split it into sections to be ran on independent groups of nodes (this is called &quot;sharding&quot;).  For any productivity application (Docs, CRM, PM, HR, etc.), this is trivial.  This is because the data in my Google Docs account has no relationship to the data in your account (or very minor relationships in the case of shared docs).  This means that these services can grow and grow and no matter how big they get, they won&#039;t get slower and they won&#039;t crash.

Twitter, however, has a very different setup.  Every account, every message, every comment, etc can potentially have a relationship to every other row.  Not only that, but given the fact that there or some users who send out thousands of e-mails every time they write something, while hundreds of thousands who write more than they send, Twitter can&#039;t optimize for either &quot;SELECT&quot; or &quot;INSERT&quot;.  (the very things that make &quot;selects&quot; fast make &quot;inserts&quot; slow and the reverse is also true).

This is nothing that Twitter did wrong, it&#039;s the nature of the service they are trying to provide.  But that&#039;s why it&#039;s unstable.  It is not an indicator of potential for a productivity application to be unstable.

2) The idea that you can keep better local backups than a service can keep online backups is, well, false.

Any database designer is going to enable &quot;replication&quot; on their databases.  This means that at a minimum your data is going to be spread across multiple groups of nodes and probably multiple data-centers.  For any single node to fail, it would have to catch on fire.  This is because of RAID (which is used on any server).

I know in our case, for us to actually loose data, you would have to bomb our data center, bomb Amazon S3 US data-center and bomb Amazon S3 EU data-center.  In the case of Google, you would have to have most of the continents sink  into the sea.

3) If your concern is loosing your own Internet connection, that is an actual legitimate concern.  But, again, in the case of Google Docs, they have a &quot;Gears&quot; enabled version that allows you to access your docs even when you don&#039;t have a connection.  

Other developers have other approaches to solve this problem, in our case we are building our apps to have native iPhone/Android versions that cache important data locally on the device.  I&#039;m sure Zoho is working on an approach, though I don&#039;t know what it is.

All in all, data in a web application is much safer and much more available than data on your computer.  Just because Twitter is having problems with scale doesn&#039;t mean that any other application will have similar problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan -</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, Dan, I don&#8217;t want to respond to this (because this is certainly not the topic that John is trying to cover), but statements like yours I&#8217;ve seen all over the web and they give a really false impression for people (and reporters who spread them). (which is I&#8217;m sure how you got this impression)</p>
<p>1) Comparing a productivity web application to Twitter (in terms of uptime) isn&#8217;t fair to either of them.  Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>In basic database design, at some point when you get a really big table (which happens when you have a lot of data) your going to want to split it into sections to be ran on independent groups of nodes (this is called &#8220;sharding&#8221;).  For any productivity application (Docs, CRM, PM, HR, etc.), this is trivial.  This is because the data in my Google Docs account has no relationship to the data in your account (or very minor relationships in the case of shared docs).  This means that these services can grow and grow and no matter how big they get, they won&#8217;t get slower and they won&#8217;t crash.</p>
<p>Twitter, however, has a very different setup.  Every account, every message, every comment, etc can potentially have a relationship to every other row.  Not only that, but given the fact that there or some users who send out thousands of e-mails every time they write something, while hundreds of thousands who write more than they send, Twitter can&#8217;t optimize for either &#8220;SELECT&#8221; or &#8220;INSERT&#8221;.  (the very things that make &#8220;selects&#8221; fast make &#8220;inserts&#8221; slow and the reverse is also true).</p>
<p>This is nothing that Twitter did wrong, it&#8217;s the nature of the service they are trying to provide.  But that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s unstable.  It is not an indicator of potential for a productivity application to be unstable.</p>
<p>2) The idea that you can keep better local backups than a service can keep online backups is, well, false.</p>
<p>Any database designer is going to enable &#8220;replication&#8221; on their databases.  This means that at a minimum your data is going to be spread across multiple groups of nodes and probably multiple data-centers.  For any single node to fail, it would have to catch on fire.  This is because of RAID (which is used on any server).</p>
<p>I know in our case, for us to actually loose data, you would have to bomb our data center, bomb Amazon S3 US data-center and bomb Amazon S3 EU data-center.  In the case of Google, you would have to have most of the continents sink  into the sea.</p>
<p>3) If your concern is loosing your own Internet connection, that is an actual legitimate concern.  But, again, in the case of Google Docs, they have a &#8220;Gears&#8221; enabled version that allows you to access your docs even when you don&#8217;t have a connection.  </p>
<p>Other developers have other approaches to solve this problem, in our case we are building our apps to have native iPhone/Android versions that cache important data locally on the device.  I&#8217;m sure Zoho is working on an approach, though I don&#8217;t know what it is.</p>
<p>All in all, data in a web application is much safer and much more available than data on your computer.  Just because Twitter is having problems with scale doesn&#8217;t mean that any other application will have similar problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
