<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes But Would You Pay For It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/08/28/yes-but-would-you-pay-for-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/08/28/yes-but-would-you-pay-for-it/</link>
	<description>Small business marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:06:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Merchant Account Specialist Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/08/28/yes-but-would-you-pay-for-it/comment-page-1/#comment-401121</link>
		<dc:creator>Merchant Account Specialist Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=1826#comment-401121</guid>
		<description>In response to the &quot;if there is someone in todayâ€™s web 2.0 world that has something they can give to me for a price, there will be someone else willing to offer it free of charge!&quot; -- I completely agree. But if I find myself using a free service or program on a daily basis I am at least willing to donate something to their cause. If it is useful enough to me, then the creators probably put a lot of time and thought into it. 

I really like Peter Shankman&#039;s approach: 
&quot;So a few things about this list: First off, yes, it&#039;s free. It takes me a few minutes each day to do this, and the good Karma is immeasurable. So I&#039;m not charging. If you really feel like sending me a donation or something, why not just send a few bucks to an animal hospital or animal rescue society somewhere. Some good places are Best Friends Animal Sanctuary, or The National Search Dog Foundation. That&#039;ll keep the good Karma flowing.&quot;

Now there is a service(and a philosophy) I would like to contribute to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the &#8220;if there is someone in todayâ€™s web 2.0 world that has something they can give to me for a price, there will be someone else willing to offer it free of charge!&#8221; &#8212; I completely agree. But if I find myself using a free service or program on a daily basis I am at least willing to donate something to their cause. If it is useful enough to me, then the creators probably put a lot of time and thought into it. </p>
<p>I really like Peter Shankman&#8217;s approach:<br />
&#8220;So a few things about this list: First off, yes, it&#8217;s free. It takes me a few minutes each day to do this, and the good Karma is immeasurable. So I&#8217;m not charging. If you really feel like sending me a donation or something, why not just send a few bucks to an animal hospital or animal rescue society somewhere. Some good places are Best Friends Animal Sanctuary, or The National Search Dog Foundation. That&#8217;ll keep the good Karma flowing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now there is a service(and a philosophy) I would like to contribute to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web Content</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/08/28/yes-but-would-you-pay-for-it/comment-page-1/#comment-401102</link>
		<dc:creator>web Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=1826#comment-401102</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately with a lot of software for which the &quot;tutorial&quot; option is available, the purveyors of the app leave you feeling that there is sooo very much you can gain from paying for the complete package by leaving tabs with tempting titles visible but untouchable... It&#039;s frustrating as sin when you then pay for the device and find that none of the extra option are actually all that exciting!! It completely puts me off paying for software at all, whether or not there&#039;s a free tutorial..
My philosophy is, if there is someone in today&#039;s web 2.0 world that has something they can give to me for a price, there will be someone else willing to offer it free of charge!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately with a lot of software for which the &#8220;tutorial&#8221; option is available, the purveyors of the app leave you feeling that there is sooo very much you can gain from paying for the complete package by leaving tabs with tempting titles visible but untouchable&#8230; It&#8217;s frustrating as sin when you then pay for the device and find that none of the extra option are actually all that exciting!! It completely puts me off paying for software at all, whether or not there&#8217;s a free tutorial..<br />
My philosophy is, if there is someone in today&#8217;s web 2.0 world that has something they can give to me for a price, there will be someone else willing to offer it free of charge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nagurski</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2008/08/28/yes-but-would-you-pay-for-it/comment-page-1/#comment-401044</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nagurski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=1826#comment-401044</guid>
		<description>I agree with the general point as to the &#039;true test&#039; of an offering.

Clearly not everything can be advertising supported - which ultimately means they&#039;ll have to sell something. The idea of creating an audience (or user base) and then finding a way to monetise it is false luxury that most small business owners would do well to avoid. Even some of the biggest players have trouble turning eyeballs into cash.

That&#039;s not to say you need to charge from &#039;day one&#039; but without a clear idea of how, when and from whom you&#039;ll generate revenues you&#039;ll be hard pressed to create a real business before the funding coffers run dry. Which is why I feel many of the VC funded businesses we see profiled are poor examples for most small business owners and entrepreneurs.

Having seen and worked with a lot of startups, the best advice I ever heard was actually a question, &quot;But who&#039;s going to buy it?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the general point as to the &#8216;true test&#8217; of an offering.</p>
<p>Clearly not everything can be advertising supported &#8211; which ultimately means they&#8217;ll have to sell something. The idea of creating an audience (or user base) and then finding a way to monetise it is false luxury that most small business owners would do well to avoid. Even some of the biggest players have trouble turning eyeballs into cash.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say you need to charge from &#8216;day one&#8217; but without a clear idea of how, when and from whom you&#8217;ll generate revenues you&#8217;ll be hard pressed to create a real business before the funding coffers run dry. Which is why I feel many of the VC funded businesses we see profiled are poor examples for most small business owners and entrepreneurs.</p>
<p>Having seen and worked with a lot of startups, the best advice I ever heard was actually a question, &#8220;But who&#8217;s going to buy it?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
