<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Round of Changes for Alexa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/another-round-of-changes-for-alexa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/another-round-of-changes-for-alexa/</link>
	<description>Small business marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:39:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/another-round-of-changes-for-alexa/#comment-411088</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=3155#comment-411088</guid>
		<description>I completely discount Alexa&#039;s ability to accurately try and calculate traffic. Having many websites some with half the traffic rank lower than other sites and these sites I am referring to now only have regular static backlinks. These types of links should be the easiest to track.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;for my search engine, Alexa does not account for the 12,000 javascript toolbars that are on peoples computers, the affliate program with thousands of generated links, or other javascript search boxes that are out there. My point being that Alexa&#039;s traffic rankings at least what I see of them is flawed from the beginning. From time to time I will look at the rankings for other websites, and can be used as a generic guide but I don&#039;t believe they are accurate. At least for several of my sites especially the engine, they are completely wrong. If I am wrong about the tracking of javascript please let me know, as far as my search engine I am positive they are not being tracked. My own stats and analytics is all that matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely discount Alexa&#39;s ability to accurately try and calculate traffic. Having many websites some with half the traffic rank lower than other sites and these sites I am referring to now only have regular static backlinks. These types of links should be the easiest to track.</p>
<p>for my search engine, Alexa does not account for the 12,000 javascript toolbars that are on peoples computers, the affliate program with thousands of generated links, or other javascript search boxes that are out there. My point being that Alexa&#39;s traffic rankings at least what I see of them is flawed from the beginning. From time to time I will look at the rankings for other websites, and can be used as a generic guide but I don&#39;t believe they are accurate. At least for several of my sites especially the engine, they are completely wrong. If I am wrong about the tracking of javascript please let me know, as far as my search engine I am positive they are not being tracked. My own stats and analytics is all that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/another-round-of-changes-for-alexa/#comment-407320</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=3155#comment-407320</guid>
		<description>I completely discount Alexa&#039;s ability to accurately try and calculate traffic. Having many websites some with half the traffic rank lower than other sites and these sites I am referring to now only have regular static backlinks. These types of links should be the easiest to track.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;for my search engine, Alexa does not account for the 12,000 javascript toolbars that are on peoples computers, the affliate program with thousands of generated links, or other javascript search boxes that are out there. My point being that Alexa&#039;s traffic rankings at least what I see of them is flawed from the beginning. From time to time I will look at the rankings for other websites, and can be used as a generic guide but I don&#039;t believe they are accurate. At least for several of my sites especially the engine, they are completely wrong. If I am wrong about the tracking of javascript please let me know, as far as my search engine I am positive they are not being tracked. My own stats and analytics is all that matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely discount Alexa&#39;s ability to accurately try and calculate traffic. Having many websites some with half the traffic rank lower than other sites and these sites I am referring to now only have regular static backlinks. These types of links should be the easiest to track.</p>
<p>for my search engine, Alexa does not account for the 12,000 javascript toolbars that are on peoples computers, the affliate program with thousands of generated links, or other javascript search boxes that are out there. My point being that Alexa&#39;s traffic rankings at least what I see of them is flawed from the beginning. From time to time I will look at the rankings for other websites, and can be used as a generic guide but I don&#39;t believe they are accurate. At least for several of my sites especially the engine, they are completely wrong. If I am wrong about the tracking of javascript please let me know, as far as my search engine I am positive they are not being tracked. My own stats and analytics is all that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LEADSExplorer</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/another-round-of-changes-for-alexa/#comment-406931</link>
		<dc:creator>LEADSExplorer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=3155#comment-406931</guid>
		<description>Our experience growing to 5,700 visits/month:
Alexa is good for a first traffic estimation, especially if there is not much traffic.

However Compete is more accurate once the number of visitors surpasses the 4,500 visit/month.

Quantcast misses completely our amount of traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our experience growing to 5,700 visits/month:<br />
Alexa is good for a first traffic estimation, especially if there is not much traffic.</p>
<p>However Compete is more accurate once the number of visitors surpasses the 4,500 visit/month.</p>
<p>Quantcast misses completely our amount of traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dager</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/another-round-of-changes-for-alexa/#comment-406909</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=3155#comment-406909</guid>
		<description>I have started to use it a little more now and find it quite fascinating. I think they are moving in the right direction and enjoyed hearing an overview of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have started to use it a little more now and find it quite fascinating. I think they are moving in the right direction and enjoyed hearing an overview of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Bovay</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/another-round-of-changes-for-alexa/#comment-406903</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Bovay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=3155#comment-406903</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see (and experience) the changes.  I also like the new look to the stats reporting - easier to read.  I have often found Alexa to be somewhat of a mystery in terms of ranking algorithm - glad it&#039;s evolving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see (and experience) the changes.  I also like the new look to the stats reporting &#8211; easier to read.  I have often found Alexa to be somewhat of a mystery in terms of ranking algorithm &#8211; glad it&#8217;s evolving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/another-round-of-changes-for-alexa/#comment-406888</link>
		<dc:creator>Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=3155#comment-406888</guid>
		<description>It seems to be more user friendly, but do you guys know how can it happen that I do not have a traffic rank for the previous day?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be more user friendly, but do you guys know how can it happen that I do not have a traffic rank for the previous day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/another-round-of-changes-for-alexa/#comment-406882</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ Rodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=3155#comment-406882</guid>
		<description>I agree, Alexa&#039;s site seems more streamlined now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Alexa&#8217;s site seems more streamlined now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O.</title>
		<link>http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/another-round-of-changes-for-alexa/#comment-406880</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/?p=3155#comment-406880</guid>
		<description>The new Alexa is much better from a user perspective. It&#039;s much easier for us to see our ranking shifts on a daily, weekly, and monthly scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Alexa is much better from a user perspective. It&#8217;s much easier for us to see our ranking shifts on a daily, weekly, and monthly scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 405/411 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.ducttapemarketing.com @ 2012-02-10 03:11:11 -->
